CLARK v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CAS. INS. CO.

No. 28126.

66 P.3d 242 (2003)

138 Idaho 538

Richard CLARK, individually, Julie Clark, individually, Allan Clark and Michael Clark, minors, by and through their parent and guardian, Richard Clark, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 2002, Term.

March 11, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Litster Law Offices, Boise, for appellants. Mitchell Ronald Barker argued.

Cantrill, Skinner, Sullivan & King, LLP, for respondent. Robert D. Lewis argued.


TROUT, Chief Justice.

This is an action to enforce an "uninsured motor vehicle" provision in an automobile insurance policy. The insured appeals a district court decision on cross motions for summary judgment holding the insurance policy did not provide coverage for the accident at issue.

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant, Richard Clark (Mr. Clark), was a passenger in a vehicle driven by his wife, Julia Clark (collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases