STENOVICH v. WACHTELL, LIPTON


195 Misc.2d 99 (2003)

756 N.Y.S.2d 367

In the Matter of LELAND STENOVICH, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Petitioner, v. WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ, Respondent.

Supreme Court, New York County.

January 2, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach (Benjamin Y. Kaufman, Art Leahy and Trisha McCormick of counsel), for petitioner.

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (Michael A. Charish of counsel), respondent pro se.

Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canaday, Falk & Rabkin, San Francisco, California (Noah B. Novogrodsky, of the California Bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for First Security Board of Directors.


OPINION OF THE COURT

CHARLES J. TEJADA, J.

Introduction

Pursuant to New York Civil Practice Law and Rules §§ 3102 and 3124, petitioner seeks an order directing Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (Wachtell Lipton), a New York law firm, to produce certain documents demanded by petitioner but withheld by respondent on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. Petitioner was represented by Benjamin Y. Kaufman, Art...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases