1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 6 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 6 Cal.Rptr.3d 286 (2003)
 

COUNTY OF ORANGE v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. G032843

6 Cal.Rptr.3d 286 (2003)

113 Cal.App.4th 1

COUNTY OF ORANGE et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Orange County, Respondent; Vedanta Society of Southern California et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three

October 7, 2003

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin P. de Mayo, County Counsel and Jack W. Golden, Deputy County Counsel; Law Offices of William D. Ross, Los Angeles, and Lisabeth D. Rothman for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Connor, Blake & Griffin, Edmond M. Connor and David J. Hesseltine, Irvine, for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

We have before us a hard fought writ proceeding over, of all things, the contents of an administrative record in a CEQA case. At the behest of the project opponents, the trial judge excluded items which, as we show below, are required by law to be in that record.

We now grant the petition to require their inclusion. Petitioners have no adequate remedy at law. In CEQA cases time is money. A project opponent can "win" even though...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases