A claim such as plaintiff's, based upon an alleged expectancy under a will, is not recognized in this state. Although such a claim is recognized under Illinois law, which plaintiff contends should govern, the motion court correctly concluded, after an interest analysis, that New York rather than Illinois law is applicable, particularly since both parties are domiciled in this state and any economic injury to plaintiff would be sustained here (see Padula v Lilarn Props...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
