PATE v. U.S.

No. CIV.A. 02-1529(RBW).

277 F.Supp.2d 1 (2003)

Anthony PATE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al. Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

July 23, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick J. Brynn, Frederick J. Brynn, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Stratton C. Strand, United States Attorney's Office, Harold Samuel Ginsberg, Holly Michelle Johnson, Office of Corporation Counsel, D.C., Washington, DC, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

WALTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Anthony Pate, brings this action pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1971, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and on District of Columbia ("D.C.") common law grounds. Both claims are predicated on plaintiff's proposition that the defendants violated his constitutional rights when they failed to provide him with a timely parole revocation hearing. The defendants named in the complaint include: the District...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases