Summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's cause of action for medical malpractice should have been denied since the affirmation of plaintiff's expert, a plastic surgeon, was sufficient to raise factual issues as to whether defendant doctor's decision to treat plaintiff's baldness with hair transplants was medically appropriate and as to whether the transplants were performed in accordance with prevailing professional standards of professional care (cf. Alvarez v Prospect...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
