DESIDERIO v. OCHS


100 N.Y.2d 159 (2003)

791 N.E.2d 941

761 N.Y.S.2d 576

SAMUEL DESIDERIO, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, GALE ORGANIST, Respondent, v. ROBERT L. OCHS et al., Defendants, and NEW YORK HOSPITAL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided April 8, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillips Nizer LLP, New York City (Stuart A. Summit, James S. Frank, Judith S. Roth and Jeffrey L. Shore of counsel), for appellant.

Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore, New York City (Matthew Gaier, Thomas A. Moore and Norman Bard of counsel), for respondent.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (David Lawrence III, Daniel Smirlock and Michael S. Buskus of counsel), in his statutory capacity under Executive Law § 71.

Fager & Amsler, Syracuse (Frances A. Ciardullo of counsel), for Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company, Inc., amicus curiae.

Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, LLP, Lake Success (Steven J. Ahmuty, Jr., of counsel), for FOJP Service Corporation and another, amici curiae.

Paul M. Duffy, New York City, Mauro Goldberg & Lilling LLP, Great Neck (Barbara D. Goldberg and Kenneth Mauro of counsel), and Fiedelman & McGaw, Jericho (Andrew Zajac of counsel), for Defense Association of New York, Inc., amicus curiae.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Fay Leoussis, Pamela Seider Dolgow, Margaret G. King, Christina M. White and John Hogrogian of counsel), for City of New York and another, amici curiae.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, Albany (Philip Rosenberg and Laurie T. Cohen of counsel), for Healthcare Association of New York State and others, amici curiae.

Susan C. Waltman, New York City, for Greater New York Hospital Association, amicus curiae.

Jeffrey A. Lichtman, New York City, and Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & De Cicco (Brian J. Isaac and Brian Shoot of counsel) for New York State Trial Lawyers' Association, amicus curiae.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, WESLEY and GRAFFEO concur with Judge CIPARICK; Judges ROSENBLATT and READ concur in result in separate concurring opinions.


OPINION OF THE COURT

CIPARICK, J.

In Bryant v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. (93 N.Y.2d 592 [1999]) and earlier cases, we interpreted some of the "nuts-and-bolts" calculations required by the structured judgment provisions of CPLR articles 50-A and 50-B. In this medical malpractice action, defendant hospital, by its insurance carrier, claims that the legislative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases