1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 132 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 116 (2003)
 

O'HARE v. MUNICIPAL RESOURCE CONSULTANTS

No. B153165.

132 Cal.Rptr.2d 116 (2003)

107 Cal.App.4th 267

Nicholas O'HARE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MUNICIPAL RESOURCE CONSULTANTS et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

Review Denied June 25, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Joseph M. Lovretovich and Joseph M. Lovretovich, Woodland Hills, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Proskauer Rose, Harold M. Brody, Los Angeles, and Christine de Bretteville for Defendants and Appellants.

CHARLES S. VOGEL, P.J.

INTRODUCTION

This appeal involves interpretation of an arbitration provision contained in an employment contract between appellant Municipal Resource Consultants (MRC) and respondent Nicholas O'Hare (O'Hare). After MRC fired O'Hare, O'Hare filed a lawsuit. MRC moved to compel arbitration. The trial court refused to enforce the arbitration provision, finding it did not meet the criteria...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases