1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 127 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 127 Cal.Rptr.2d 113 (2003)
 

MARIN HEALTHCARE DIST v. SUTTER HEALTH

No. C034127.

127 Cal.Rptr.2d 113 (2003)

103 Cal.App.4th 861

MARIN HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SUTTER HEALTH et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

Review Denied February 25, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steefel, Levitt & Weiss, Stephen S. Mayne, San Francisco, and David T. Vanalek, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

McDonough, Holland & Allen, Richard E. Brandt, Sacramento, for Defendant and Respondent Sutter Health.

Keegin, Harrison, Schoppert & Smith, Jeffrey S. Schoppert and Wendy L. Wyse, San Rafael, for Defendants and Respondents Marin General Hospital and Marin Community Health.

KOLKEY, J.

In this action, we must determine whether the judicially created doctrine enunciated in Hoadley v. San Francisco (1875) 50 Cal. 265, 1875 WL 1581 (Hoadley)—that the statute of limitations does not apply to actions by the state to recover property dedicated for public use against an adverse possessor—should be extended to bar the application of the statute of limitations to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases