STATE of Texas, Petitioner,
v.
ONE SUPER CHERRY MASTER VIDEO 8-LINER MACHINE, et al., Respondent.
Supreme Court of Texas.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued September 11, 2002.
Decided April 3, 2003.
Rehearing Denied May 8, 2003.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Idolina Garcia, William F. Lewis, Jr., Jeffrey S. Boyd, Howard G. Baldwin, First Assistant Attorney General of Texas, Michael T. McCaul, Executive Assistance Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Texas, Julie Caruthers Parsley, Office of the Solicitor General of Texas, Austin, John Cornyn, United States Senate, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Eddie G. Shell, Burnet, Larry Zinn, San Antonio, Richard D. Davis, Austin, for Respondent.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Justice JEFFERSON delivered the opinion of the Court.
Today, in Hardy v. State,102 S.W.3d 123 (Tex.2003), we held that although the State must establish probable cause before initiating a forfeiture proceeding, the person found in possession of an alleged gambling device has the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, at a show cause hearing either that the machine is not a gambling device or that the exclusion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
