JENSEN v. MEDLEY

(CC 9410-07258; CA A97720; SC S48478, S48487).

82 P.3d 149 (2003)

336 Or. 222

Nancy J. JENSEN, Respondent on Review-Petitioner on Review, v. Walter R. MEDLEY, Sublimity Insurance Company, Local Union No. 49, and Roofers Building Association & Charles Ouellette, Defendants, and The United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers, Petitioner on Review Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 26, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Feinberg, of Asher, Gittler, Greenfield, Cohen & D'Alba, Ltd., Chicago, Illinois, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner on review-respondent on review. With him on the briefs were Marvin Gittler, of Asher, Gittler, Greenfield, Cohen & D'Alba, Ltd., Chicago, Illinois, and Janet M. Schroer, of Hoffman, Hart & Wagner, Portland.

I. Franklin Hunsaker, of Bullivant Houser Bailey, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondent on review-petitioner on review. With him on the briefs was Steven V. Rizzo, of Seidl & Rizzo, LLP, Portland.

Gene B. Mechanic, of Goldberg, Mechanic, Stuart & Gibson, Portland, filed the brief for amicus curiae American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations. With him on the brief was Craig Becker, Chicago, Illinois.

Maureen Leonard, Portland, filed the brief for amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, RIGGS, and BALMER, Justices.


BALMER, J.

This case requires us to determine and apply the standards under which an international union can be held liable for the wrongful actions of an affiliated local union. Plaintiff brought this action against the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers (International), its Local No. 49 (Local), and others. She alleged various claims, including employment discrimination in violation of the Oregon whistleblower law, former ORS 659...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases