PUNSLY v. HO

No. D039312.

129 Cal.Rptr.2d 89 (2003)

105 Cal.App.4th 102

Marilyn PUNSLY, et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Manwah HO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

Review Denied March 26, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps and Charles A. Bird, San Diego, for Defendant and Appellant.

Trope and Trope and Thomas Paine Dunlap, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


HUFFMAN, J.

In this family law dispute, defendant and appellant Manwah Ho appeals from an order denying her motion for attorney fees under the private attorney general theory of Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 (hereafter section 1021.5). Ho sought an award of fees incurred in a visitation dispute with the paternal grandparents of her daughter Kathryn, plaintiffs and respondents Marilyn and Bernard Punsly. Ho...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases