1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 80 P.3d
  5. 80 P.3d 135 (2003)
 

STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. GENTRY

No. SCBD 4773.

80 P.3d 135 (2003)

2003 OK 95

STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. William Nelson GENTRY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

November 4, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan Murdock, General Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Association, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Complainant.

William Nelson Gentry, pro se, Montclair, California, for Respondent.

OPALA, V.C.J.

¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record1 submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? and (2) Is a public censure, the required attendance of Oklahoma-approved mandatory continuing legal education (MCLE) programs, the filing of an annual MCLE report and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases