1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 70 P.3d
  5. 70 P.3d 144 (2003)
 

CITY OF TACOMA v. MARY KAY, INC.

No. 27332-2-II.

70 P.3d 144 (2003)

117 Wash.App. 111

CITY OF TACOMA, a municipal corporation, Respondent, v. MARY KAY, INC., f/k/a Mary Kay Cosmetics, Inc., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

May 28, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott M. Edwards, Perkins Coie LLP, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Harding Thomas Roe, Attorney at Law, City Attorney's Office, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

HOUGHTON, J.

Mary Kay, Inc., appeals from a trial court decision that the City of Tacoma's appeal from a hearing examiner tax assessment refund order invoked the superior court's original jurisdiction and in allowing further pretrial discovery. Because, under these facts, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter, we reverse and dismiss.

FACTS

Mary Kay, Inc., an out-of-state corporation, manufactures and distributes wholesale skin care...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases