PER CURIAM.
Because the evidence does not support the conclusion that, as alleged, the appellant deliberately falsified statements in his post-conviction motions, the order adjudicating him in contempt for doing so is reversed with directions to dismiss the contempt proceeding. See Brown v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.