1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 835 A.2d
  5. 835 A.2d 1257 (2003)
 

IRISH PUB v. STOVER

835 A.2d 1257 (2003)

364 N.J. Super. 351

IRISH PUB, Richard Burke and Cathy Burke, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Rachelle STOVER, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 26, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin J. Jacobs, Jr., Atlantic City, argued the cause for appellants (Jacobs & Barbone, attorneys; Mr. Jacobs, of counsel; Arthur J. Murray, on the brief).

Richard F. DeLucry, Atlantic City, argued the cause for respondent (Sandson & DeLucry, attorneys; Mr. DeLucry, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, LISA and KIMMELMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LISA, J.A.D.

This appeal raises a novel issue: Does the entire controversy doctrine bar a post-judgment motion to enforce an order, where the party seeking enforcement has brought a prior post-judgment motion to enforce some other aspect of the same order, and where the party seeking enforcement knew about both alleged violations of the order when the first motion was filed? The motion judge concluded the doctrine applied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases