1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 852 So.2d
  5. 852 So.2d 1200 (2003)
 

UNITED RENTALS HIGH. TECH. v. ST. PAUL SUR.

No. 37,265-CW.

852 So.2d 1200 (2003)

UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ST. PAUL SURETY, et al., Defendants-Applicants.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

August 20, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Osborn & Osborn by R.A. Osborn, Jr., R.A. Osborn, III, Gretna, for Respondent.

Krebs, Farley & Pelleteri, L.L.C. by David J. Krebs, Alberta L. Adams, for Applicants.

Before GASKINS, PEATROSS and MOORE, JJ.

MOORE, J.

United States Fidelity & Guarantee ("USF & G")1 contests an order denying, without written reasons, its motion for summary judgment. Upon our de novo review, we find that the Public Works Act claim of United Rentals Highway Technologies Inc. ("United Rentals") was not timely filed and that USF & G is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, but that USF & G is not entitled to attorney fees for defending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases