The trial court properly found that the parties' 1996 agreement obligating defendants to repay plaintiffs the principal sum of $225,000 was never superseded, as alleged by defendants, by a 1998 agreement freeing them of the repayment obligation. The purported 1998 agreement, although drafted, was never signed by all the necessary parties, nor was there evidence of performance unequivocally referable to it (see Rose v Spa Realty Assoc.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
