TRIBUZIO v. RODER


813 A.2d 1210 (2003)

356 N.J. Super. 590

Toren TRIBUZIO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles RODER, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 10, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard V. Gilbert argued the cause for appellant (Evan F. Nappen, attorney; Mr. Nappen, on the brief).

Respondent did not file a brief.

Before Judges KING, LISA and FUENTES.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LISA, J.A.D.

We consider in this appeal whether a former dating partner, after a three-year hiatus from the end of the dating relationship, is a protected person under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 to —35(Act). Defendant, Charles Roder, seeks reversal of a Final Restraining Order (FRO) issued under the Act in favor of plaintiff, Toren Tribuzio. Defendant argues that notwithstanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases