1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 822 A.2d
  5. 822 A.2d 1196 (2003)
 

TEN VOTERS OF BIDDEFORD v. CITY OF BIDDEFORD

822 A.2d 1196 (2003)

2003 ME 59

TEN VOTERS OF the CITY OF BIDDEFORD v. The CITY OF BIDDEFORD et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided: April 25, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Lourie (orally), Cape Elizabeth, for plaintiffs.

Harry B. Center II (orally), Aaron P. Burns, Smith Elliott Smith & Garmey, P.A., Saco, for defendant.

Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ.

DANA, J.

[¶ 1] The Ten Voters of the City of Biddeford (the Voters) appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche J.), dismissing their request for declaratory relief as moot and subsequently denying their Rule 591 motion to alter or amend the judgment because they had failed to include a Rule 7(b)(1)(A)2 notice with their motion. The Voters contend the action should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases