ROSE v. ASIA ELECTRONICS HOLDING CO., INC.


2 A.D.3d 196 (2003)

767 N.Y.S.2d 771

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Respondent, v. ASIA ELECTRONICS HOLDING CO., INC., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 9, 2003.


The proposed counterclaims for legal malpractice were correctly rejected as time-barred since defendant moved to amend more than three years after the alleged acts of malpractice (CPLR 214 [6]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 N.Y.2d 295, 301 [2002]). Supreme Court correctly rejected defendant's allegations of breach of fiduciary duty as duplicative of the malpractice claim. We have considered and rejected defendant's arguments that the relation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases