1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 816 A.2d
  5. 816 A.2d 1159 (2003)
 

O'DONNELL v. R.M. SHOEMAKER & CO.

816 A.2d 1159 (2003)

James O'DONNELL & Linda O'Donnell, Appellants v. R.M. SHOEMAKER & CO. and Fluidics, Inc. and Jerome Penn, Appellees.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed February 3, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Hamilton, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Thomas E. Butler, Philadelphia, for appellees.

Before: McEWEN, P.J.E., STEVENS, J., and OLSZEWSKI, J.

STEVENS, J.

¶ 1 At issue in this case is whether an injured worker may recover in tort from an employee of the injured worker's statutory employer or whether such recovery is limited to benefits under the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act (Act), 77 P.S. §§ 1-2626. In granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of Appellees R.M. Shoemaker & Company, Fluidics, Inc. (hereinafter Fluidics), and Jerome Penn, the trial court concluded that James...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases