1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 814 A.2d
  5. 814 A.2d 1146 (2003)
 

BD. OF CHOSEN v. COUNTY EXEC.

814 A.2d 1146 (2003)

357 N.J. Super. 242

BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OF THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, Defendant-Respondent, and Board of Education of the Hudson County Schools of Technology, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, and Reverend Edward Allen and Thomas Murphy, and Defendants-Appellants, and John Doe and XYZ Corporation, Defendants, and Michael Gallo and John Mautone, Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 3, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen F. DeSoto argued the cause for appellants.

Edward J. Florio, Hoboken, argued the cause for respondent Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Hudson (Sarkisian, Florio & Kenny, attorneys; Mr. Florio and Nita Raval, on the brief).

Donato Battista, Jersey City, argued the cause for respondent Thomas A. DeGise, County Executive of the County of Hudson (respondent joined in the brief of respondents Michael Gallo and John Mautone).

Cindy Nan Vogelman, Secaucus, argued the cause for respondents Michael Gallo and John Mautone (Chasan, Leyner, Bariso & Lamparello, attorneys; Ms. Vogelman, on the brief).

John P. Lacey, Roseland, argued the cause for respondent/ cross-appellant Board of Education of the Hudson County Schools of Technology (Connell Foley, attorneys; Mr. Lacey, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges KING, WEFING and FUENTES.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WEFING, J.A.D.

In this appeal we are called upon to consider whether the County Executive of Hudson County was required to seek the advice and consent of the Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County ("Freeholders") prior to making appointments to the Board of Education of the Hudson County Schools of Technology ("Board of Education"). The trial court concluded that the County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases