1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 62 P.3d
  5. 62 P.3d 133 (2003)
 

MACE v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 2 CA-IC 2002-0010.

62 P.3d 133 (2003)

204 Ariz. 207

David MACE, Petitioner Employee, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Tremco, Inc., Respondent Employer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group, Respondent Insurer.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

January 30, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian Clymer, Tucson, Attorney for Petitioner Employee.

The Industrial Commission of Arizona By Laura L. McGrory, Phoenix, Attorney for Respondent.

Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C. By K. Casey Kurth and Andrea L. Kravets, Phoenix, Attorneys for Respondents Employer and Insurer.

OPINION

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner David Mace seeks review of the administrative law judge's (ALJ) award denying him workers' compensation benefits to pay for conjoint marriage and family counseling to which he and his family had been referred by his psychiatrist. He argues the ALJ's decision was erroneous because the counseling was "reasonably required" to treat his condition. See A.R.S. § 23-1062(A). Citing Post...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases