VORSTEG v. THOMAS

No. 4D02-1952.

853 So.2d 1102 (2003)

Stanley VORSTEG, Appellant, v. Edmund THOMAS and Patricia, his wife, individually, and Patricia Thomas, as parent and natural guardian of Giselle Thomas, a minor, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing Denied September 26, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Mark Purdy of Purdy & Flynn, P.A., and Fred L. Fulmer of Law Offices of Fred Land Fulmer, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Patrice A. Talisman of Hersch & Talisman, P.A., Miami, and Silverstein, Silverstein & Silverstein, Aventura, for appellees.


WARNER, J.

We affirm the final judgment awarding appellee damages. While appellant contends that the court abused its discretion in admitting speculative testimony regarding appellee's future lost earning capacity, counsel did not object to the evidence. As to both future lost earning capacity and future medical expenses, appellant and appellee offered conflicting expert testimony. The jury returned a verdict favoring appellee's experts' view of the evidence.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases