1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 827 A.2d
  5. 827 A.2d 1121 (2003)
 

BORTECK v. RIKER, DANZIG

827 A.2d 1121 (2003)

362 N.J. Super. 284

Robert D. BORTECK, Esq., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RIKER, DANZIG, SCHERER, HYLAND & PERRETTI LLP, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 21, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn A. Clark, Morristown, argued the cause for appellant (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, pro se; Mr. Clark and Charles F. Waskevich, Jr., of counsel; Mr. Clark, on the brief).

Robert Novack, Short Hills, argued the cause for respondent (Edwards & Angell, attorneys; Mr. Novack and Mary L. Moore, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, CUFF and LEFELT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CUFF, J.A.D.

In this appeal, we review an order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting specific performance of the early retirement provisions of a law firm partnership agreement. We affirm.

Plaintiff Robert Borteck is a lawyer and a former capital partner at defendant Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland, & Perretti LLP (Riker). After eleven and one-half years at Riker and at fifty-three years...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases