NORTH. IND. COMMUTER v. CHICAGO SOUTHSHORE

No. 46A03-0301-CV-33.

793 N.E.2d 1133 (2003)

NORTHERN INDIANA COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO SOUTHSHORE AND SOUTH BEND RAILROAD, a Partnership, Appellee-Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

August 20, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael C. Harris, Harris Welsh & Lukmann, Chesterton, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

Peter J. Rusthoven, Christian P. Jones, Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis, IN, Craig V. Braje, Braje & Nelson, Michigan City, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.


OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

In Bopp v. Brames, 677 N.E.2d 629 (Ind.Ct.App.1997), we noted that the purpose of arbitration is to afford parties the opportunity to reach a final disposition of differences in an easier, more expeditious manner than by litigation. Unfortunately, as this case demonstrates, arbitration is not always easier or more expeditious. Northern Indiana...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases