1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 80 Conn.
  5. 80 Conn. App. 111 (2003)
 

DOE v. RAPOPORT

(AC 23125).

80 Conn. App. 111 (2003)

JOHN DOE ET AL. v. JONATHAN RAPOPORT ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released November 4, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Farrell, for the appellants (defendants).

Joseph G. Walsh, for the appellee (plaintiffs).

Lavery, C. J., and Bishop and Hennessy, Js.

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The defendants, Jonathan Rapoport, Haig Development, LLC, and Opus Management, Inc., appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting a prejudgment attachment in the amount of $1 million in favor of the plaintiffs, John Doe, Jane Doe, James Doe and Jeff Doe. On appeal, the defendants claim that (1) the court improperly found that the affidavit on which the court based its judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases