1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 836 So.2d
  5. 836 So.2d 1065 (2003)
 

NASTASE v. FLA. FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERV.

No. 5D02-1833.

836 So.2d 1065 (2003)

Lee NASTASE, Appellant, v. FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION, etc., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 31, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Glasser, of Glasser and Handel, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Alec D. Russell and Ted L. Shinkle, of Gray, Harris & Robinson, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellee.

GRIFFIN, J.

Plaintiff below, Lee Nastase ["Nastase"], appeals an order granting summary final judgment in favor of defendant below, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ["the Commission"].

On August 25, 2000, Nastase filed a complaint and demand for jury trial against the Commission. Nastase alleged damages pursuant to the Federal Employment Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), and the Florida Employment Discrimination Act, section 760...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases