1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 814 A.2d
  5. 814 A.2d 1069 (2003)
 

LINDQUIST v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY FIRE DEPT.

814 A.2d 1069 (2003)

175 N.J. 244

Richard LINDQUIST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT, Respondent-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas W. Polaski, Freehold, argued the cause for appellant (Gary P. Sarlo, attorney).

John H. Geaney, Mt. Laurel, argued the cause for respondent (Capehart & Scatchard, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.

The issue raised in this appeal is whether petitioner's employment as a fireman for approximately twenty-three years caused or contributed to his development of pulmonary emphysema within the meaning of the occupational disease provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act. Resolution of that issue requires us to decide how much...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases