VAN NOTE-HARVEY ASSOCS, P.C. v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST HANOVER


816 A.2d 1041 (2003)

175 N.J. 535

VAN NOTE-HARVEY ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The TOWNSHIP OF EAST HANOVER, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 12, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Spero argued the cause for appellant (McCarthy and Schatzman, attorneys).

Christopher E. Martin argued the cause for respondent (Weiner Lesniak and Ohrenstein & Brown, attorneys; Mr. Martin and Margaret A. Miller, on the brief).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.

This case is essentially a suit on a book account in which plaintiff seeks to recover contractual prejudgment interest on "accumulating accounts receivables." Although the complaint sought such prejudgment interest, that issue was not submitted to the jury. The trial court indicated that it would decide that issue after the jury rendered its verdict. Judgment entered pursuant to the jury's verdict provided that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases