CHRYSLER CORP. (DE) v. CHAPLAKE HOLDINGS

No. 63,2002, 65,2002.

822 A.2d 1024 (2003)

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, (DELAWARE), Defendant Below, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. CHAPLAKE HOLDINGS, LTD., Portman Lamborghini, Ltd. (In Receivership), and David T. Lakeman, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, Cross-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: May 9, 2003.

Reargument/Rehearing En Banc Denied May 27, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Parkins, Jr., of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington; Robert D. Cultice (argued), Michael R. Heyison, G. Perry Wu, and James S. Goldman, of Hale and Dorr, LLP, Boston MA, of counsel, for Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

Laurence V. Cronin, of Smith, Katzenstein & Furlow, LLP, Wilmington; Michael J. Connolly (argued), Kelley A. Jordan-Price and Catherine S. Kim of Hinckley Allen & Snyder, LLP, Boston, MA, of counsel, for Appellees, Cross-Appellants.

Before HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices, and WALSH, Justice (Retired).


WALSH, Justice (Retired).

This is an appeal from a jury award of damages in the Superior Court arising from a failed enterprise for the sale and distribution of Lamborghini automobiles in the United Kingdom. The appellant, defendant-below, contends the Superior Court erred in permitting recovery on the theory of promissory estoppel. The appellee has cross-appealed from rulings disallowing a claim for negligent misrepresentation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases