1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 825 A.2d
  5. 825 A.2d 966 (2003)
 

ENGINEERING MGT. SERVICES, INC. v. MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

No. 71, Sept. Term, 2002.

825 A.2d 966 (2003)

375 Md. 211

ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. v. MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

June 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip M. Andrews (Jean E. Lewis, Kramon & Graham, P.A., on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.

William A. Kahn, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Laurie A. Lyte, Asst. Atty. Gen., on brief), Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J. ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL and BATTAGLIA, JJ.

HARRELL, J.

I.

State procurement contracts are subject to an exclusive, statutorily-prescribed procedure for resolving disputes. The procedure consists of four parts.1 First, the dispute must be submitted to the agency procurement officer for attempted resolution.2 Second, the agency head may approve, disapprove, or modify the procurement officer's decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases