1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 815 A.2d
  5. 815 A.2d 962 (2003)
 

KOTKIN v. ARONSON

815 A.2d 962 (2003)

175 N.J. 453

Ross KOTKIN and Audrey Kotkin, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Bernard ARONSON and Estelle Aronson, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 26, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin D. Sheehan, Ocean City, argued the cause for appellants (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys, Cherry Hill).

Richard I. Rosenberg, Northfield, argued the cause for respondents (Rosenberg & Goldstein, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment below, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 358 N.J.Super. 284, 817 A.2d 962 (2002). We add only these brief comments to amplify that opinion.

Plaintiffs and defendants are, respectively, intended buyers and sellers of a parcel of real estate, which includes a residential dwelling. The parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases