DUPREE v. CITY OF CLIFTON


815 A.2d 960 (2003)

175 N.J. 449

Isa DUPREE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF CLIFTON, Defendant, and The Netherlands Reformed Church, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 24, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell J. Makowicz, Jr., Chatham, argued the cause for appellant (Blume, Goldfaden, Berkowitz, Donnelly, Fried & Forte, attorneys).

Barry A. Knopf, Saddle Brook, argued the cause for respondent (Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf, attorneys; Mr. Knopf and Albert L. Cohn, of counsel; Audra DePaolo, on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Newman's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 351 N.J.Super. 237, 798 A.2d 105 (2002).

For affirming—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN—7.

Opposed

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases