1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 71 P.3d
  5. 71 P.3d 105 (2003)
 

LAIRD v. STROOT

97CV0346, A103337.

71 P.3d 105 (2003)

188 Or. App. 118

Melvin L. LAIRD, Appellant, v. Dr. Randall C. STROOT and Dr. Fadi Elias Malak, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 12, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Sue Guthrie, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Thomas F. Armosino, Medford, filed the brief for respondents. With him on the brief was Frohnmayer, Deatherage, Pratt, Jamieson, Clarke & Moore, P.C.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

EDMONDS, P.J.

Plaintiff sued defendants, two podiatrists, for malpractice in their treatment of his hammertoe condition.1 The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants on statute of limitations grounds, and we originally affirmed without opinion. Laird v. Stroot, 165 Or.App. 314, 995 P.2d 597 (2000).2 The Supreme Court thereafter allowed plaintiff's petition for review, vacated our decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases