1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 839 So.2d
  5. 839 So.2d 902 (2003)
 

GOODMAN v. STATE

No. 1D02-339.

839 So.2d 902 (2003)

Ronald GOODMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Gary D. Wimsett, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Robert L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a conviction, following a jury trial, for possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis. The state's case was based on constructive possession. Appellant denied knowledge that the cannabis was present. This placed in dispute the essential element of knowledge of the illicit nature of the substance, as well as that of knowledge of the presence of the substance. Scott v. State, 808 So.2d 166

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases