1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 350 F.3d
  5. 350 F.3d 1376 (2003)
 

UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS v. GRAPHIC CONTROLS CORP.

No. 03-1081.

350 F.3d 1376 (2003)

UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GRAPHIC CONTROLS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided December 4, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Burbidge, Burbidge & Mitchell, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Stephen B. Mitchell and Jefferson W. Gross.

Russell E. Levine, Kirkland & Ellis, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Mary E. Zaug and Christopher R. Liro.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, MICHEL, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

After a jury verdict, the United States District Court for the District of Utah entered judgment in favor of Utah Medical Products, Inc. The jury found that Graphic Controls Corporation's Softrans® device infringes Utah Medical's U.S. Patent No. 4,785,822 (the '822 patent). The district court denied Graphic Controls' motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) following the jury verdict. In a later bench trial, the district court determined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases