1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 351 F.3d
  5. 351 F.3d 1364 (2003)
 

KUMAR v. OVONIC BATTERY CO., INC.

Nos. 02-1551, 02-1574, 03-1091.

351 F.3d 1364 (2003)

Kaplesh KUMAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OVONIC BATTERY CO., INC. and Energy Conversion Devices, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided December 11, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kaplesh Kumar, of Wellesley, Massachusetts, argued pro se.

Patrick J. Coyne, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Troy E. Grabow.

Before BRYSON, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Opinion concurring in result filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Kaplesh Kumar, owner of U.S. Patent No. 4,565,686 (the "'686 patent"), appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, granting summary judgment of non-infringement to Ovonic Battery Company, Inc. and Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases