1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 325 F.3d
  5. 325 F.3d 1356 (2003)
 

BIO TECHNOLOGY GENERAL v. DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS

No. 02-1195.

325 F.3d 1356 (2003)

BIO TECHNOLOGY GENERAL CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 1, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles A. Weiss, Kenyon & Kenyon, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Richard L. DeLucia.

George C. Lombardi, Winston & Strawn, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Christine J. Siwik, and Christopher Shearer. Of counsel on the brief were William J. Sipio, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, of New York, NY; and Victor N. Balancia, Pennie & Edmonds LLP, of New York, NY. Of counsel was Todd A. Wagner, Pennie & Edmonds, LLP, of Washington, DC.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

The late Dr. Samuel Pasquale invented a contraceptive regimen in which a woman takes small doses of unopposed estrogen during a portion of the initial phase of her menstrual cycle, i.e., beginning a few days after the onset of menses, and daily doses of progestin for the remainder of the cycle. The small amounts of estrogen taken during the initial phase are believed to prevent an egg from becoming available for fertilization by suppressing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases