1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 854 So.2d
  5. 854 So.2d 812 (2003)
 

AMATO v. INTINDOLA

No. 4D02-3366.

854 So.2d 812 (2003)

Sal AMATO and Clara Amato, his wife, Appellants, v. Randolph J. INTINDOLA and City of Hallandale, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing Denied October 10, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Kneski, Miami, for appellants.

Mark Goldstein, City Attorney, Hallandale Beach, for appellees.

WARNER, J.

In this personal injury action, the trial court dismissed appellant's complaint after concluding that he perpetrated a fraud on the court. The trial court's dismissal was based on a videotape taken by an investigator which depicted appellant performing several activities that he testified at his deposition that he was unable to perform. We adopt the analysis of Jacob v. Henderson, 840 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases