1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 345 F.3d
  5. 345 F.3d 1318 (2003)
 

ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES v. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS

Nos. 02-1517, 02-1518.

345 F.3d 1318 (2003)

ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 25, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen E. Noona, Kaufman & Canoles, P.C., of Norfolk, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Kristan B. Burch. Of counsel on the brief were Mark L. Hogge and Kathryn L. Clune, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, of Washington, DC.

Alan M. Anderson, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Mark E. Ungerman and Michael J. Strauss, of Washington, DC; and Marcy Hogan Greer, of Austin, Texas.

Before LINN, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LINN; Circuit Judge DYK concurs in part and dissents in part.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Bridgeport Fittings, Inc. ("Bridgeport") appeals from the entry of judgment in favor of Arlington Industries, Inc. ("Arlington") after a jury trial on Arlington's suit for infringement of its United States Patent No. 5,736,674 ("'674 patent"). Arlington Indus., Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., No. 3:99-CV-1857 (M.D.Pa. June...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases