LUOYANG BEARING FACTORY v. U.S.

SLIP OP. 03-141, Court No. 99-12-00743.

288 F.Supp.2d 1369 (2003)

LUOYANG BEARING FACTORY, Plaintiff and Defendant-Intervenor, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor and Plaintiff.

United States Court of International Trade.

October 27, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hume & Associates, PC, Washington, DC (Robert T. Hume) for Luoyang, plaintiff and defendant-intervenor.

Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director, and Jeanne E. Davidson, Deputy Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice (Ada E. Bosque); Amanda L. Blaurock, Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, for the United States, defendant, of counsel.

Stewart and Stewart (Terence P. Stewart and Wesley K. Caine) for Timken, defendant-intervenor and plaintiff.


OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.

I. Standard of Review

The Court will uphold Commerce's redetermination pursuant to the Court's remand unless it is "unsupported by substantial evidence on the record, or otherwise not in accordance with law." 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(b)(1)(B)(i) (1994). Substantial evidence is "more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Universal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases