1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 338 F.3d
  5. 338 F.3d 1299 (2003)
 

U.S. v. PANFIL

No. 02-15627.

338 F.3d 1299 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian PANFIL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 25, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Klugh, Jr., Kathleen M. Williams and Miguel Caridad, Fed. Pub. Defenders, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Gerald E. Greenberg, Anne R. Schultz, Harriett R. Galvin, Stephen Schlessinger, Miamk, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before ANDERSON, COX and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Brian Panfil appeals his conviction and sentence for using the internet to persuade a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422. Panfil challenges the constitutionality of the statute, arguing that § 2422(b) is overbroad and vague. Panfil also contests the district court's application of § 2A3.2 of the Sentencing Guidelines to calculate his sentence. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases