BRIGHT v. PA BD. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE


831 A.2d 775 (2003)

Freddie BRIGHT, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided September 3, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Freddie Bright, petitioner, pro se.

Marsha Mills Davis, Camp Hill, for respondents.

BEFORE: SMITH-RIBNER, Judge, LEAVITT, Judge, and MIRARCHI, JR., Senior Judge.


OPINION BY SENIOR JUDGE MIRARCHI, JR.

Before this Court are the preliminary objections of the Department of Corrections (Department) and the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board), (collectively Respondents), to the petition for review in the nature of an action in mandamus filed by Freddie Bright (Bright), an inmate at the State Correctional Institute at Mahanoy. We sustain the preliminary objections and dismiss the petition for review for failure to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases