CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOC. v. HALLWOOD GROUP

No. 219, 2002.

817 A.2d 777 (2003)

CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 6 and Corporate Property Associates 7, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants Below, Appellants, v. The HALLWOOD GROUP INCORPORATED, Defendant/Counter-claim Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: March 5, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas R. Hunt, Jr., Esquire (argued), and Thomas W. Briggs, Jr., Esquire, of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellants.

Lawrence C. Ashby, Esquire, Richard D. Heins, Esquire (argued), and Joseph C. Handlon, Esquire, of Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, Delaware, and Charles A. Crocco, Jr., Esquire of Crocco & De Maio, P.C., Mount Kisco, New York, Of Counsel, for Appellee.

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, HOLLAND, BERGER and STEELE, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.


BERGER, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider whether disputed language in a letter agreement constitutes a general release of all claims. The trial court found the language, "[a]fter repayment of the Note, [appellee] will have no further obligation to the [appellants]," to be plain, unequivocal and global. We disagree. Given the fact that the letter agreement addressed only the early payoff of a note, we find that the contested language does not clearly act as a release...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases