NEAL H. HOWARD & ASSOCIATES v. CAREY & DANIS, LLC

No. 4:02-CV-51-3.

244 F.Supp.2d 1344 (2003)

NEAL H. HOWARD & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiff v. CAREY & DANIS, LLC, Thomas J. Carey, Individually, and William F. Sasser, Individually, Defendants

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Columbus Division.

February 11, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Dixon James, D. Shifley Robinson, Columbus, GA, Christopher Adams, Neal Henry Howard, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff.

Lawrence S. Burnat, Jason W. Graham, Atlanta, GA, C. Morris Mullin, Columbus, GA, for Defendants.


ORDER

LAND, District Judge.

The Court presently has pending before it Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds that there are no genuine issues of material fact to be tried regarding Defendants' accord and satisfaction defense, and that Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Therefore, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This case arises from a fee dispute between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases