HAUSCHILDT v. BECKINGHAM

No. A03-218.

668 N.W.2d 916 (2003)

Wayne HAUSCHILDT, et al., Appellants, v. Dennis J. BECKINGHAM, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 23, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Lyons, Thomas J. Lyons & Associates, Little Canada, MN, and Guy M. Burns, Jonathan S. Coleman, Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A., Tampa, FL, for appellants.

Vernon J. Vander Weide, Thomas V. Seifert, Head, Seifert & Vander Weide, Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by HUDSON, Presiding Judge, RANDALL, Judge, and MINGE, Judge.


OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

In this appeal from a dismissal of their complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, appellants argue that the district court improperly: (1) held that collateral estoppel barred their action; (2) held that there could be no fiduciary relationship as a matter of law; and (3) determined that class certification was improper. Because the district court based its dismissal on defensive collateral estoppel,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases