1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 662 N.W.2d
  5. 662 N.W.2d 917 (2003)
 

PIETSCH v. MN BD. OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS

No. C6-02-2117.

662 N.W.2d 917 (2003)

David M. PIETSCH, D.C., et al., Relators, v. MINNESOTA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 17, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Wolfe, Jr., Wolfe & Associates, St. Paul, and Wilbur W. Fluegel, Fluegel Law Office, Minneapolis, for relators David M. Pietsch, D.C. and Pietsch Chiropractic Clinic.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Rosellen Condon, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by HALBROOKS, Presiding Judge, HARTEN, Judge, and FORSBERG, Judge.

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Relator David Pietsch challenges the Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners' conclusions that he engaged in unlawful fee splitting in violation of Minn.Stat. § 148.10, subd. 1(a)(16) (2002), and unprofessional conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 148.10, subd. 1(a)(11), (e) (2002). Relator moves to strike portions of respondent's brief and asserts that the board's conclusions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases