1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 73 P.3d
  5. 73 P.3d 84 (2003)
 

EVANS v. TETON COUNTY

No. 27854.

73 P.3d 84 (2003)

139 Idaho 71

Richard EVANS and Matthew Finnegan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TETON COUNTY, Idaho Board Of Commissioners, Teton Springs, L.L.C., Max H. Rammell and Denice K. Rammell, husband and wife, Merrill R. Rammell and Roberta L. Rammell, husband and wife, Miles E. and Jessie M. Hastings Family Trust, Kearsley Family L.L.C., and John H. Winger, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, March 2003 Term.

Rehearing Denied July 28, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phyllis Lamken, Victor, argued for appellants.

Teton County Attorney, Driggs, for respondent Teton County. Laura Lowery argued.

Holden, Kidwell, Hahn & Crapo, Idaho Falls, for respondent Teton Springs, L.L.C. Dale Storer argued.

Roy Moulton, Driggs, for respondents Rammell, et al.

KIDWELL, Justice.

Richard Evans and Matthew Finnegan (appellants) appeal the Teton County Board of County Commissioners' (Board of Commissioners) decision to approve Teton Springs, L.L.C.'s (Teton Springs) final plat of phase 1 of the Teton Springs subdivision, request for a zone change from A-2.5 to R-1, and application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The Board of Commissioners' decision is affirmed.

I.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Teton...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases